The Trump Tariffs are dead - long live the Trump Tariffs?
As we expected, the Supreme Court struck down most of the new tariffs President Trump had imposed since taking office thirteen months ago. While Congress granted the President “emergency” powers to regulate trade in a 1977 law, the Court ruled 6-3 that the statute does not explicitly authorize the use of tariffs under those powers. As a result, many of the recently imposed tariffs exceeded the authority Congress delegated to the executive branch.
The tariffs invalidated by the Court include additional tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico tied to concerns over illegal immigration and drug trafficking; “liberation day” tariffs aimed at reducing trade deficits, and additional duties on Brazil and India, based on the way the former country handled the prosecution of its former president and the latter’s handling of Russian oil.
However, other tariffs remain in place. These include those on steel and aluminum, as well as tariffs on China that date back to the first Trump Administration. In addition, there are other legal avenues for the President to use to impose tariffs. Justice Kavanaugh went so far as to spell those out in his dissent. And the president announced a new 10%+ tariff (over the weekend, he said he would raise this to 15%) on the rest of the world using those other legal avenues.
In other words, Trump’s tariffs are going to change and evolve, but aren’t going away. As a result, the reaction in markets on Friday (stocks up, bond yields down) is likely to reverse once the smoke clears.
Some are claiming the Court decision will mean lower inflation, but if tariffs remain, that argument falls apart. More importantly, that argument is flawed economically. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon. Higher tariffs meant consumers had to spend more on tariffed goods, leaving less money for other goods and services. Inflation is caused by too much money chasing too few goods, and the money supply has been growing slowly.
And lost in the noise is some good news for those who want a smaller, less intrusive government. The court ruling may have been a bitter pill for the Trump Administration to swallow, but over time the reasoning used to strike down the tariffs will make it tougher to expand the power of the federal government. For example, if a future president wanted to use “emergency” tariffs to punish countries that don’t limit carbon emissions or countries that strictly limit immigration, then those tariffs wouldn’t be legal, either.
Looking ahead, tariffs may remain a feature of U.S. policy regardless of which party controls the White House after 2028. A Republican administration would likely maintain much of the current trade posture.
Another possibility is that a Democrat wins the presidency in 2028, but the GOP maintains control of the U.S. Senate. If so, it’s very unlikely that the president would have enough Senate votes to raise income taxes or taxes on corporate profits. In turn, that means keeping tariffs to help finance spending increases without a huge expansion in the budget deficit. Yes, deficit spending has grown wildly in the past, like during the Global Financial Crisis and COVID, but that was when the interest cost of the debt was about 1.5% of GDP, not 3.0%+ like it is now.
If we get a Democratic Sweep in 2028 – President, Senate, and House – then lower tariffs are possible. But would you want to be the president who cuts tariffs on China only to have them invade Taiwan six or nine months later? It's believed that geopolitical issues will limit tariff cuts in the years ahead.
The remaining big issue is whether the tariffs struck down by the Court will be refunded. The Supreme Court punted that issue back to the lower court. For all we know , the lower court may decide that a refund would be a windfall for some businesses, because it was their customers who truly paid the extra cost, and those customers will not get the refund money. Or the court could decide that refunds are due, but it could take years for them to actually be issued.
In the meantime, while the Trump tariffs seem to have died, they are not gone for good. And while many may hate the tariffs for various philosophical and economic reasons, the economy continues to grow with relatively low inflation.
Source: Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist, Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist First Trust
Chart reflects price changes, not total return. Because it does not include dividends or splits, it should not be used to benchmark performance of specific investments. Data provided by Refinitiv.
Sincerely,
Fortem Financial
(760) 206-8500
team@fortemfin.com
Latest News
Fed's Waller: January jobs data an upside surprise, if it continues a policy pause may be appropriate
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he was open to leaving interest rates on hold at the Fed's March meeting if upcoming February jobs data indicates the U.S. labor market had "pivoted to a more solid footing" after a weak 2025.
Reuters
Wall Street futures slide and gold rallies on Trump tariff tumult
Wall Street futures and European stocks dropped while gold rallied on Monday as confusion over U.S. trade policy hit markets, after President Donald Trump announced a new 15% tariff following the Supreme Court's ruling against his global levies.
Reuters
