The job market was surprisingly strong in May, with non-farm payrolls growing 172,000, beating even the strongest forecasts for the month. As a result, the futures market is now pricing in a quarter-point rate hike later this year and, more likely than not, another quarter-point rate hike sometime in 2027.
But we think a rate hike would be ill-advised and unlikely. First, this is a good employment report, but not a “barnburner.” Barnburner job growth is 300,000 to 400,000 per month. Even Keynesians who think strong job growth causes inflation are overreacting.
Second, yes, the CPI is up 3.8% versus a year ago , and the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, the PCE Deflator, hasn’t been at or below 2.0% for more than five years. But we think without the Iran War temporarily boosting prices, the Fed had already set the stage for a return to 2.0% inflation. The M2 measure of the money supply is up 4.7% from a year ago and has been up at a 3.2% annual rate in the past three years. By contrast, in the ten years prior to COVID, when inflation was consistently below the Fed’s 2.0% target, the money supply was up at a 6.2% rate.
In other words, the money supply has been growing slowly enough for inflation to be brought under control. However, the war has driven oil prices higher, lifting official inflation measures. Over time, higher oil prices will mean less money for consumers to spend on other products, which will push down prices for other products.
But in the short run, consumers have reacted to higher oil prices by running down their savings rate. In January, consumers saved 4.3% of their income. Yes, that’s low historically, but nothing compared to the 2.6% saving rate in April. That may not seem like much, but if the new, lower savings rate holds for a year, consumer savings would be down by $400 billion from January levels. That reduction in the saving rate temporarily gives ample room to pay for higher oil prices without putting downward pressure on the prices of other goods and services.
Don’t mistake this argument for the one used several years ago when former Fed Chairman said the increase in inflation was “transitory.” Back then, inflation measured by the PCE Deflator peaked at more than 7.0% – the highest in forty years – and the M2 measure of the money supply had skyrocketed about 40%.
On the other side of the conflict with Iran (whenever that is) are lower energy prices, consistent with modest growth in the money supply and a reassertion by consumers of a higher pace of saving. It is possible that this conflict drags on. Iran is not negotiating in good faith and fired missiles into Israel last night. But even if this war continues, and inflation stays elevated, it would be wrong to raise rates. Why hit consumers, whose spending is already growing faster than their incomes, with a rate hike on top of everything else? Higher oil prices are a drag on growth…why compound it?
Other indicators are consistent with lower inflation. For example, despite robust job growth, average hourly earnings are up only 3.4% from a year ago, matching the slowest pace in five years. This is consistent with 2.0% inflation plus the long-term trend of 1.5% productivity growth. If productivity growth is faster than it is right now – and we will be writing about this issue in the weeks ahead – then 3.4% wage growth is an even stronger signal that monetary policy is already tight enough to bring inflation back down to 2.0% (after the Iran War).
As said earlier, job growth doesn’t cause inflation, but neither do rising wages. The Fed operates under a Keynesian model that holds that strong growth causes inflation. It’s wrong, but it still does it. So, what will it focus on: temporarily higher inflation, or moderate wage growth? Raising rates is a mistake.
Other measures of inflation have been lower. For example, the Dallas Fed’s measure of “trimmed mean” inflation, which ignores the most volatile categories of prices, is up only 2.4% from a year ago, down from 2.6% in April 2025.
At present, we don’t think newly minted Chairman Kevin Warsh has the votes to cut short-term interest rates, even if he wanted to. But given modest wage growth and moderate trimmed-mean inflation, we think Warsh does have a political clout at the Fed to keep rate hikes at bay.
The market sell-off on Friday was more about a better-than-expected jobs number than about it. The market is overvalued. We don’t expect a crash, but the idea that the market will only move one way (higher) has always been wrong.
Source: Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist, Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist First Trust
Chart reflects price changes, not total return. Because it does not include dividends or splits, it should not be used to benchmark performance of specific investments. Data provided by Refinitiv.
Sincerely,
Fortem Financial
(760) 206-8500
team@fortemfin.com
Latest News
Nvidia clinches deals with South Korean giants including SK Group to advance AI boom
Nvidia on Monday announced a series of deals in South Korea with tech giants including SK Hynix and Naver, as it looks to secure crucial memory chips to power its AI ambitions and entice new customers.
Reuters
Oil prices pare gains after Iran and Israel say they have halted attacks
U.S. crude futures were up $2.57 at $93.11 per barrel.
Reuters
