The moves made by China last week should not be a surprise...
Last Friday President Trump seemed to come out of nowhere with one of his famous Tweets saying he would impose the pending tariffs on China starting at 12:01am Friday May 10. This caused markets to react negatively as it seemed President Trump was going rogue. Markets opened down on Monday almost 400 points and then rebounded by the end of the day recovering most of its loss. Yesterday we were not so lucky and the market sold off on the worries of no China trade deal. So what do we make of the Presidents Tweet?
It seems that on Friday the U.S received a notice from China that basically was reneging on most all of the important trade agreements made on paper between the two parties thus far. To some this seems like it was out of left field, and if it was anyone else we would agree. However, we are dealing with China and this is exactly how they negotiate. Anyone who has negotiated a business deal with the Chinese knows that they are very well known to change the deal in the 11th hour to better suit their needs. They will even go to great lengths to try and frustrate their negotiating partners and wear them down all in the pursuit of what they deem to be the best deal For China. This negotiating style goes back centuries and there is not much anyone can do to try and change this behavior.
President Trump knows how to negotiate with the Chinese. The reason he sent the Tweet he did last week was to let the Chinese know they can negotiate the way they want to and that we will do the same. The fact that the Chinese said they would not negotiate with a gun to their head but are still sending negotiators to Washington this week is a sign that President Trump may have called their bluff. We will have to see how this works out, but our view is that as long as they are still talking, a deal should be able to be worked out. A comprehensive deal would be beneficial for both sides, but we do not think President Trump will settle on a deal that is not in our best interest.
We have heard the view expressed recently that a trade fight between the U.S. & China is acceptable now because U.S. growth is solid (3.2% real GDP in 1Q) and inflation is low. We acknowledge the U.S. economy is in good shape. We also acknowledge inflation has been low. However, there are still numerous reasons global trade disruptions are troublesome, particularly now:
1) While U.S. growth has been solid, some of the 1Q boost came from inventories (+0.7% points) which should be paid back in future quarters. Global growth has also been more lackluster.
2) A key fear at the end of 2018 was the Fed would over-tighten against this global backdrop, which has been alleviated by the FOMC pause in 2019. We are just starting to see the positive effects of this monetary policy pause, which affects the economy with a lag. Another market hiccup now would tighten financial conditions, with a Fed that is reluctant to go any further and ease (pause yes, ease no).
3) While inflation has been low, there are still signs it is not dead (rising capacity utilization, rising wages, slowing supplier delivery times). The bond market is not providing a lot of cushion against even a small amount of inflation, with the 10-year Treasury yield at 2.5%.
4) U.S. bank lending standards, while still expansionary, do not look particularly easy. This is a leading indicator for payroll employment. The household employment survey has also been weaker than the payroll survey the past 3 months. Proprietor’s income has also been in a slowing trend.
5) U.S. manufacturing employment has already started to slow, and U.S. mfg PMI measures are still in a downtrend (following global weakness last year).
6) The U.S. budget deficit is large for an economy at full employment (e.g., the unemployment rate at 3.6%). This is manageable if we see capital spending rise, that capital spending boosts productivity, and that productivity pays for higher wages. But CEOs/CFOs seem to be reluctant to start this process (e.g., do the capex) without some clarity on trade policy.
Brian Amidei is Coachella Valley's only Barron's Magazine Top 1,000 Advisor in 2013 and 2014!
Brian Amidei, along with Partners Joseph Romano and Brett D'Orlando have also been named *2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Five Star Wealth Managers!
Awards and recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, companies, and/or publications should not be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if Fortem is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services; nor should they be construed as a current or past endorsement of Fortem or its representatives by any of its clients. Rankings published by magazines and others are generally based on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized advisor. Awards may not be indicative of one client?s experience or of the Firm?s future performance. Neither Fortem nor the recognized advisor has paid a fee for inclusion on a list, nor purchased any additional material from the award provider. The criteria for each award is listed below:
The Barron's award is is based on the recognized adviser's assets under management, contribution to the firm's revenues and profits, and quality of practice. Investment performance is not an explicit criteria. Additional information about this award is available at http://online.barrons.com/report/top-financial-advisors.
Five Star Professional Disclosure:
The Five Star Wealth Manager award is based on 10 eligibility and evaluation criteria: 1) Credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR) or a registered investment advisor; 2) Actively employed as a credentialed professional in the financial services industry for a minimum of five years; 3) Favorable regulatory and complaint history review; 4) Fulfilled their firm review based on internal firm standards; 5) Accepting new clients; 6) One-year client retention rate; 7) Five-year client retention rate; 8) Non-institutionalized discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered; 9) Number of client households served; and 10) Educational and professional designations. The inclusion of a wealth manager on the Five Star Wealth Manager list should not be construed as an endorsement of the wealth manager by Five Star Professional or the magazine. The award methodology does not evaluate the quality of services provided. Additional information about this award is available at: fivestarprofessional.com/2016FiveStarWealthManagerMethodology.pdf
Fortem Financial 2016. All rights reserved.
Data Sources: News items are based on reports from multiple commonly available international news sources (i.e. wire services) and are independently verified when necessary with secondary sources such as government agencies, corporate press releases, or trade organizations. Market Data: Based on reported data in WSJ Market Data Center (indexes); U.S. Treasury (Treasury Yields); U.S. Energy Information Administration/Bloomberg.com Market Data (oil spot price, WTI Cushing, OK); www.goldprice.org (spot gold/silver); Oanda/FX Street (currency exchange rates). All information is based on sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or guarantee is made as to its accuracy or completeness.
Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities, and should not be relied on as financial advice. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of Fortem Financial, LLC or any of its affiliates. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal, and there can be no guarantee that any investing strategy will be successful. Forward looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, the economy, and future conditions. As such, forward-looking statements are subject to inherent uncertainty, risks, and changes in circumstance that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from the anticipated outcomes. Carefully consider investment objectives, risk factors and charges and expenses before investing. Fortem Financial is a registered investment adviser with the SEC. Advisory services are offered through Fortem Financial.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a price-weighted index composed of 30 widely traded blue-chip U.S. common stocks. The S&P 500 is a market-cap weighted index composed of the common stocks of 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The NASDAQ Composite Index is a market-value weighted index of all common stocks listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. The Russell 2000 is a market-cap weighed index composed of 2,000 U.S. small-cap common stocks. The Global Dow is an equally weighted index of 150 widely traded blue-chip common stocks worldwide. Market indices listed are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment.