The U.S./China trade war continued to dominate headlines last week as China announced tariffs of 5% to 10% on $75 billion of goods, including autos and oil, effective September 1st and December 1st. The action was in response to President Trump’s previously announced tariffs scheduled for September 1; they may also reflect China’s displeasure over the decision to sell $8 billion of F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan. Markets closed lower for the fourth consecutive week: the Russell 2000® Index declined 2.29% followed by Nasdaq (-1.83%), S&P 500® Index (‑1.44%) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.99%). Friday’s selloff drove interest rates down; the yield curve, which inverted briefly on Thursday and Friday, ended the week with the yield on the 10-year fractionally above the 2-year.
Chairman Powell, in comments on Friday at the annual Federal Reserve Symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, acknowledged that trade disputes are weighing on the economy. He commented, “The three weeks since our July meeting have been eventful. . . Based on our assessment of the implications of these developments, we will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion.” He also observed that there are “no recent precedents to guide any policy response to the current situation. Moreover, while monetary policy is a powerful tool that works to support consumer spending, business investment and public confidence, it cannot provide a settled rulebook for international trade.”
Trade discussions between the U.S. and China remain scheduled for early September despite the escalation in tariffs. Both sides seem frustrated by the lack of an apparent path to resolution. Meanwhile, consumer spending remains the most important catalyst for the domestic economy. Unemployment remains low, wages are improving and consumers benefit from low fuel prices; however, the impasse in trade negotiations may raise fears of a recession which may, in turn, shift consumer sentiment.
The US exported $171 billion of goods and services to China in the four quarters ending in Q1 (the latest data currently available), representing about 7% of total US exports. By contrast, about 12% of US exports went to Mexico, 14% to Canada, and 23% to the European Union. Yes, China is also a key location for production (and, therefore, profits) by US companies, but other areas are capable of picking up much of the slack, including India, Vietnam, and Mexico.
The trade war with China is costly, but unlikely to go global like it did during the Great Depression. Instead, intensifying the trade war with China would make it politically more favorable for the Trump Administration to strengthen trade ties with others, and be more inclined to relieve tariff pressure and threats on other countries. For example, the US announced Sunday that it had an agreement in principle with Japan on a new trade deal that could be signed in September.
Following the upcoming Labor Day holiday, the markets will likely remain focused on the latest trade developments and previews of third quarter earnings announcements. Companies are identifying actions to manage trade-related uncertainties and mitigate the impact of trade wars until conditions improve. These tactics, which may bode well for the equity markets longer-term, will likely prolong market volatility. Analysts were very quick to pin the blame for weakness in stocks late last week on the trade war with China. We agree that uncertainty regarding the future of US-China trade relations was a drag on equities, but think it was far from the only reason for weakness. In fact, it wasn't even the most negative news of the week.
To us, there was also another potentially worrisome bit of news that wasn't at all related the trade issues or the debate about monetary policy, which is a consistent obsession of financial journalists and social media. The Business Roundtable announced that almost all of its CEOs signed a statement saying they were no longer going to run their companies with the primary goal of serving shareholders. Instead, CEOs would lead their companies to benefit all "stakeholders," including "customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders."
There are some who may view this as an outright rejection of what's come to be known as the Friedman Doctrine, named after free-market icon Milton Friedman, which suggests that a firm's only objective should be to act on behalf of its shareholders. In turn, if shareholders want to use their wealth to pursue pet personal or social causes, they're free to do so themselves with their earnings from corporate profits. "Insofar as a [corporate manager's] actions, in accord with his 'social responsibility,' reduce returns to shareholders, he is spending their money," Friedman wrote.
Those who share this viewpoint might suggest, as an example, that we imagine if Tom Brady and Bill Belichick announced that their primary goal was no longer to win ballgames. Bob Kraft would probably not be happy and the New England Patriots football team might not be worth quite as much after the announcement as it was before. This type of a change introduced uncertainty, and the markets don't like uncertainty. Well, that's part of what we think happened to the stock market last week.
Why do we say this change introduced uncertainty? Because there are examples of companies that may appear to some to have made changes from Friedman's doctrine that may not be so different from Friedman's doctrine. Let's look at Alphabet (Google) as an example. Alphabet is known for its many great employee perks. They provide their employees, among other things, free food, free cooking classes, onsite gyms and workout classes, onsite medical staff, decompression capsules, etc. Following Friedman's doctrine, some could argue all of these many perks are business managers pursuing the personal social interest and agendas. These programs all "cost" the shareholders profitability, and should therefore be done away with. On the other hand, one could argue they are creating very low employee turnover and fiercely loyal employees who will work their hearts out for Alphabet, thereby increasing shareholder value. Those who have studied education may also add Alphabet is helping its employees' brains function at a higher level. Alphabet is a very cutting edge company investing in new ideas; supporting creativity creates shareholder value. Studies have shown there are cognitive benefits to mathematicians and scientists studying music and art. There are studies showing healthier people (right food and enough exercise) are more efficient workers and have higher brain function. Additionally, health studies show that there are also benefits to reduced health care costs when people eat right and exercise. Just as those who strictly follow Friedman may argue all of Alphabet's perks are BAD because they cost the shareholder value, others can argue Alphabet's "agenda" has greatly and richly increased shareholder value.
We believe this change warrants monitoring, and we will observe the actions of corporate America to understand if this is just the new language of maximizing shareholder value or if it is a way for elite corporate managers to drive personal agendas on the shareholders' dime. If this turns out to be a way for elite corporate managers to drive personal agendas at the expense of the business and shareholders, it will prove detrimental to equity values. On the other hand, if this a more holistic view of how to create shareholder value, it could be a great benefit to businesses and shareholder value.
Source: Pacific Global Investment Management Company, Strategas
Chart reflects price changes, not total return. Because it does not include dividends or splits, it should not be used to benchmark performance of specific investments.
US orders for long-lasting goods rises 2.1% in July
US durable goods orders increase 2.1% in July, investment spending also rises
Asia Markets: Asian markets sink as Trump ratchets up tra...
Asian markets plunged in early trading Monday, as the trade war between the U.S. and China heated up.
Brian Amidei is Coachella Valley's only Barron's Magazine Top 1,000 Advisor in 2013 and 2014!
Brian Amidei, along with Partners Joseph Romano and Brett D'Orlando have also been named *2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Five Star Wealth Managers!
Awards and recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, companies, and/or publications should not be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if Fortem is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services; nor should they be construed as a current or past endorsement of Fortem or its representatives by any of its clients. Rankings published by magazines and others are generally based on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized advisor. Awards may not be indicative of one client?s experience or of the Firm?s future performance. Neither Fortem nor the recognized advisor has paid a fee for inclusion on a list, nor purchased any additional material from the award provider. The criteria for each award is listed below:
The Barron's award is is based on the recognized adviser's assets under management, contribution to the firm's revenues and profits, and quality of practice. Investment performance is not an explicit criteria. Additional information about this award is available at http://online.barrons.com/report/top-financial-advisors.
Five Star Professional Disclosure:
The Five Star Wealth Manager award is based on 10 eligibility and evaluation criteria: 1) Credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR) or a registered investment advisor; 2) Actively employed as a credentialed professional in the financial services industry for a minimum of five years; 3) Favorable regulatory and complaint history review; 4) Fulfilled their firm review based on internal firm standards; 5) Accepting new clients; 6) One-year client retention rate; 7) Five-year client retention rate; 8) Non-institutionalized discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered; 9) Number of client households served; and 10) Educational and professional designations. The inclusion of a wealth manager on the Five Star Wealth Manager list should not be construed as an endorsement of the wealth manager by Five Star Professional or the magazine. The award methodology does not evaluate the quality of services provided. Additional information about this award is available at: fivestarprofessional.com/2016FiveStarWealthManagerMethodology.pdf
Fortem Financial 2016. All rights reserved.
Data Sources: News items are based on reports from multiple commonly available international news sources (i.e. wire services) and are independently verified when necessary with secondary sources such as government agencies, corporate press releases, or trade organizations. Market Data: Based on reported data in WSJ Market Data Center (indexes); U.S. Treasury (Treasury Yields); U.S. Energy Information Administration/Bloomberg.com Market Data (oil spot price, WTI Cushing, OK); www.goldprice.org (spot gold/silver); Oanda/FX Street (currency exchange rates). All information is based on sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or guarantee is made as to its accuracy or completeness.
Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities, and should not be relied on as financial advice. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of Fortem Financial, LLC or any of its affiliates. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal, and there can be no guarantee that any investing strategy will be successful. Forward looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, the economy, and future conditions. As such, forward-looking statements are subject to inherent uncertainty, risks, and changes in circumstance that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from the anticipated outcomes. Carefully consider investment objectives, risk factors and charges and expenses before investing. Fortem Financial is a registered investment adviser with the SEC. Advisory services are offered through Fortem Financial.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a price-weighted index composed of 30 widely traded blue-chip U.S. common stocks. The S&P 500 is a market-cap weighted index composed of the common stocks of 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. The NASDAQ Composite Index is a market-value weighted index of all common stocks listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange. The Russell 2000 is a market-cap weighed index composed of 2,000 U.S. small-cap common stocks. The Global Dow is an equally weighted index of 150 widely traded blue-chip common stocks worldwide. Market indices listed are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment.