Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh used his Jackson Hole speech last week to lay out his views on monetary policy. Two things jumped off the pages of his speech.
First, "Fedspeak" may be making a comeback. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan became famous for phrases like "irrational exuberance." One section of Warsh's speech, titled "Preparing for Future Policy Conjunctures," felt like a throwback. "Conjunctures," really? Greenspan would be proud.
Second, the narrative about Warsh is that he will eliminate forward guidance and make the Fed more circumspect. Many thought that would give them less to talk about. But compared to Jerome Powell, Warsh is much more focused on the monetary side of monetary policy. Powell wouldn't answer questions about abundant reserves or money supply. His press conferences became all about interest rates and tariffs, while Warsh talks about commodity prices and M2.
Warsh laid out seven principles. The fifth of which was that "short-term interest rates are the predominant tool" for achieving the Federal Reserve's mandate.
We'd weight this differently. Inflation stayed stable when Bernanke held rates near zero for seven years, yet Powell saw inflation reach 9% after just two years of near-zero rates, and inflation has remained stubbornly high even after the recent rate hikes. There are competing explanations for that pattern — supply shocks and fiscal stimulus among them — but it's at least one reason to question how much weight short-term rates alone should carry.
Interest rates used to signal monetary policy under the "scarce reserve" regime prior to 2008. Banks traded federal funds, and changes in reserve supply helped move short-term rates. Today, banks are flooded with reserves and no longer trade them. The federal funds rate is a rate fixed by the Fed, with little market input. Money and rates are no longer as tightly connected as they once were.
That is why Warsh's sixth principle was so encouraging: "money matters." What a breath of fresh air for us Friedmanites, who see the Fed's failure to weigh the 40%+ surge in M2 during the pandemic as a key contributor to the highest inflation in 40 years.
There is an interesting tension between his fifth and sixth principles. If money matters, why should short-term interest rates be viewed as the predominant tool of monetary policy? We would suggest an alternative framework: judging policy first and foremost by what is happening to the quantity of money, rather than simply where policymakers set an overnight rate. The Fed's balance sheet, bank reserves, credit creation, and the Treasury General Account matter as well, particularly to the extent they influence the money supply.
Warsh also bashed "forward guidance." Forward guidance moves markets. The Fed says, "This is what we are going to do with rates," and the market moves there. Then analysts say, "The markets think the Fed should do this, or that." But the markets are just responding to the forward guidance. Warsh calls this a "hall of mirrors" with the markets reflecting the Fed, and then the Fed reflecting the markets. He is right.
However, if Warsh really does think that interest rates are the predominant tool of monetary policy, then forward guidance is part of that process. So, we think he is being a little inconsistent. Hopefully, he knows this and is just moving the Fed slowly but surely back to a money-focused institution.
He also said the Fed should take responsibility for 65 months of elevated inflation. It took the Fed nearly 30 years to admit it caused the inflation of the 1970s. To admit it in just 65 months is a miracle. What a breath of fresh air in DC.
Finally, his comments leaned hawkish on rates. Markets price a 65% chance of a September hike. We think that probability is more likely to rise than fall, and this represents a shift worth watching as a return to more transparent monetary policy.
Source: Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist, Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist, First Trust
Chart reflects price changes, not total return. Because it does not include dividends or splits, it should not be used to benchmark performance of specific investments. Data provided by Refinitiv.
Sincerely,
Fortem Financial
(760) 206-8500
team@fortemfin.com
Latest News
At Jackson Hole, global central bankers glimpse dystopian AI future
Imagine a world where AI-powered trading is so prevalent, fast and effective that the Federal Reserve must give two news conferences, one for humans and another for machines, to avoid humans being completely shut out of responding to shifts in monetary policy.
Reuters
Chinese factory slump eases, but weak services signal uneven recovery
China's factory activity improved in August on stronger demand but remained in contraction, while services activity stayed weak, underscoring deepening imbalances in the economy and fuelling calls for policy measures to boost the economy.
Reuters
